The Kühling brothers (http://kuehlingkuehling.de/) just released a new model of their RepRap Industrial printer: HT500
Look at their new hot end… what a beauty. In combination with their heated chamber (up to 70 °C) you can truly make use from the max. 500°C (!!!) temperature.
Here’s the link: http://kuehlingkuehling.de/shop/ht500-3d-printer/
Special introductory price is 9.990 €, which is possibly a bit above a normal Joe’s budget 
But for small businesses or bigger ones it could be a great fit.
EDIT: Mixed up heated bed and heated chamber temperature! It’s 70 °C for the chamber and 130 °C for the bed itself.
Something annoys me a bit with this company though. I read a lot of “All Open Source Technology” and “Add our Open Source principles” or “Kühling&Kühling focuses on Open Source Hardware development and manufacturing”, but beyond the use of open source projects like Slic3r, I see no access to hardware information beyond the feature list itself 
It would suit me best if they did not use too much the argument in the first place. The worst imho is/was “This is a true RepRap.” at http://kuehlingkuehling.de/2013/02/13/the-kuhlingkuhling-reprap-industrial/ I certainly would not say this of this (otherwise/anyhow extremely sleek) 3D printer, with true openess. E.g. where is the BOM then?
I am that wrong??
Hahaha, @Jeremie_Francois that was a good one (almost rolling on the floor right now ;-))!
@Jonas_Kuhling & @Simon_Kuhling are possibly the guys who are the most serious about their openness (who I know in person, right in line with you ;-)).
It’s all linked up here: http://docs.kuehlingkuehling.de/
And here’s what you’re looking for: https://github.com/kuehlingkuehling
And more specifically this repo: https://github.com/kuehlingkuehling/RepRap-Industrial
Please give those guys some special credits for having this up to date (last update 20 days ago) and even providing *.scad source files!
@Jeremie_Francois next time you’re around in Germany at a faire I personally introduce you. YOU WILL LOVE THEM.
@Erich_HaHaOh how is that related to my post? Did I miss something?
Why do you calling it all RepRap?
It’s not a replicating Replicator.
Those guys have a LONG tradition in the community. I think it’s legit to call it that way.
Also: They are doing something for the community, others failed to achieve! And that is to proof and deliver an industrial-grade product to business customers. They show off the power of Open Source and Open Hardware daily to their customers.
Full respect from my side for that.
@Florian_Horsch_flouS yep, their printer is packed with nice stuff, and they did it so long ago they seem to be on another planet! I would love to talk to them indeed! Now for the “reprap”… well, some vitamins are always required for sure
My take is that you can only call it a reprap if the entire idea is to be more printable with each version. If the next version is more printable, then it’s safe calling it a reprap. And source files shared and all that stuff too…
@Nathan_Walkner No clue. Also: Why woul you want to move the Object around and shake it through instead of moving the head around? With inperfect adhesion you limit your acceleration to a number that you don’t even know.
@matthew_bennett , this goal seems to be lost with almost all design nowadays. Just look at Prusa’s printer for example. A steel frame isn’t really printable for normal people
@Nathan_Walkner true - it seems not very well designed in this aspect. But looking closer what they all fit in (heating, carbon filter, water cooling, etc.) is makes more sense.
@Marcus_Wolschon that criticism seems a bit off topic here. K&K doesn’t shake prints around. It’s just a steady downwards movement for Z (like Ultimaker and many others).
@matthew_bennett and @Florian_Horsch_flouS : if I was to vote, I would nominate without much hesitation @Nicholas_Seward as the most hardcore reprap maker. E.g. the reprap wally with its cantilever bed would beat anything in this category: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVg7WrgHJik
@Jeremie_Francois & @Nicholas_Seward this freakin’ amazing… SO cool.
10k€ and it’s using a t-slot frame? And the largest nozzle spacing I’ve ever seen.
If it’s perfectly reliable, I’m fine with T-Slots.