You should try to print Anamarva’s derivative: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:26220 – reason being, the modifications pull out more details in the surface of the figure. We had a really fun time capturing those models at The Met!
Did you use scaffolding under the nose?
Will print, thanks for the tip.
It is a pitty that the finer details seem smothed down. I suppose that it is due to a technological limitations of the 3D digitiser process that will be overcome in time.
By the way, good job digitising all these wonders and thank you.
I rotated the model so that I did not have to use scaffolding at all.
Used 4 shells though, and the model is hollow to save material and time.
Had a look at Anamarva’s and I prefer this model, it’s more classical.